The Role of Community Engagement in Mitigating the Effects of Informal Governance and Enhancing Urban Policy Effectiveness in Contexts of Institutional Weakness in South Asia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53639/ijssr.v7i2.415Keywords:
Urban Informality, Institutional Voids, Governance Networks, Planning Theory, Informal Settlements, South AsiaAbstract
Urban informality and fragmented governance systems continue to shape the landscape of urban development in South Asia, posing challenges to equitable housing, infrastructure access, and inclusive policymaking. This study investigates how informal governance networks, institutional voids, and contested urban spaces interact with formal planning processes, particularly in the context of informal settlements. Using a mixed-methods approach, we draw on document analysis, elite interviews, and process tracing across three South Asian cities, Delhi, Kathmandu, and Dhaka, supplemented by data from 40 planning documents and 25 stakeholder interviews. The analytical framework integrates theories of institutional embeddedness and political informality, with qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) used to identify cross-case patterns. Findings reveal that informal institutions often fill governance voids, but also reinforce uneven power relations and selective legitimacy. Despite state-led efforts at urban upgrading and smart city planning, institutional multiplicity and lack of policy coordination undermine sustainable outcomes. The study recommends more integrated planning frameworks that recognize informal networks as co-governance partners, strengthened community participation, and reforms in inter-agency coordination. These insights offer critical implications for urban policy, especially in achieving the SDGs and inclusive development agendas across the Global South.
Downloads
References
Angrist, J. D., and J.-S. Pischke. Mastering ’Metrics: The Path from Cause to Effect. Princeton University Press, 2014.
Auerbach, A. M., G. Kruks-Wisner, and S. Rai. “State-Building through Service Delivery: Decentralization and Local Governance in South Asia.” Governance 35, no. 1 (2022): 1–18.
Auerbach, A. M., A. Kumar, and T. Thachil. “Clientelism in the Shadows: Informal Bureaucrats and Everyday State–Citizen Relations in India.” Governance 33, no. 1 (2020): 31–48.
Auerbach, A. M., and T. Thachil. “How Clients Select Brokers: Competition and Choice in India’s Slums.” American Political Science Review 115, no. 2 (2021): 408–424.
Banks, N., M. Lombard, and D. Mitlin. “Urban Informality as a Site of Critical Analysis.” Journal of Development Studies 56, no. 2 (2020): 223–238.
Beach, D., and R. B. Pedersen. Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. 2nd ed. University of Michigan Press, 2019.
“Bhagidari System.” Wikipedia, 2025.
Björkman, L. “State Actors and Informal Water Provision in Mumbai.” 2014.
Chattaraj, S. “Jugaad Governance in Mumbai’s Informal Settlements.” In Global Encyclopedia of Informality, vol. 2, 2012.
Chatterjee, P., and S. Sheikh. Populism and Urban Planning in South Asia: Cities in Contention. Routledge, 2024.
Desai, R. “Urban Populism and Informal Settlements: Brokerage, Violence, and Patronage in Mumbai.” Urban Studies 59, no. 12 (2022): 2509–2525.
Devlin, R. T. “Situating Informality: Spatial Theory, Practice, and the Politics of Informal Urbanization.” Planning Theory 19, no. 1 (2020): 8–29.
Follmann, A., and G. Will. “Contested Informality: The Politics of Land in Contemporary Indian Cities.” International Development Planning Review 43, no. 1 (2021): 39–60.
Gillespie, T. “Urban Governance and the Politics of Informality: Informal Housing and the State in Accra, Ghana.” Urban Studies 57, no. 5 (2020): 1020–1036.
Gupte, J., and D. Mitlin. “Urban Informality and State Restructuring: Negotiating Housing and Tenure in Mumbai and Cape Town.” International Development Planning Review 43, no. 1 (2021): 1–24.
Hasan, A. “Informal Settlements and the Paradox of Planning in Karachi.” Environment and Urbanization Asia 14, no. 1 (2023): 5–25.
Hasan, A. “Orangi Pilot Project.” Wikipedia, 2021.
Hasan, A., M. Noman, and M. Raza. “Political Contestation and Institutional Fragmentation in Urban Governance in Karachi.” Urban Studies 60, no. 4 (2023): 789–807.
Hasan, A., and S. Reza. “Informal Settlements and Formal Housing Policies in South Asia: A Disconnect.” Environment and Urbanization Asia 12, no. 2 (2021): 173–193.
Hasan, S. S., and S. Khan. “Urban Informality and Parallel Governance Systems: Shaping Citizens’ Engagements in Urban Planning Processes in Bangladesh.” International Planning Studies 26, no. 2 (2021): 129–147.
Hossain, S. “Informality and the State in Urban Governance: Reframing Planning Practices in Dhaka.” Environment and Urbanization Asia 12, no. 1 (2021): 7–24.
Hussain, N. “Why Making Sense of Informality in Cities Matters: Perspectives from an Urbanizing Asia.” Urban Studies, 2023.
Lemanski, C., and P. Mudu. “Global Perspectives on Urban Informality: The Politics of Slums.” Urban Geography 43, no. 9 (2022): 1271–1280.
Liang, K.-Y., and S. L. Zeger. “Longitudinal Data Analysis Using Generalized Linear Models.” Biometrika 73, no. 1 (1986): 13–22.
Mitlin, D. “Navigating the Urban Landscape: Informality and Planning in African and South Asian Cities.” Progress in Planning 163 (2022): 100625.
Mitlin, D., and D. Satterthwaite. “Urban Poverty and Community-Led Innovations: New Insights from SDI and UCLG.” Environment and Urbanization 33, no. 1 (2021): 3–20.
Mukhopadhyay, P., and A. Revi. “India’s Urban Governance Challenge: Mapping Institutional Multiplicity.” Cities 113 (2021): 103146.
Parnell, S., and E. Pieterse. Localizing the Sustainable Development Goals in African and South Asian Cities. Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.
Prasad, D., T. Alizadeh, and R. Dowling. “Smart City Planning and the Challenges of Informality in India.” Urban Planning 8, no. 1 (2023): 55–72.
Ragin, C. C. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. University of Chicago Press, 2009.
Rodan, G., and K. Jayasuriya. “Rethinking Institutional Voids: Embeddedness, Spaces, and Agency in Urban Governance.” New Political Economy 26, no. 3 (2021): 500–515.
Roy, A. “Rethinking Urban Informality: The Politics of Planning in the Global South.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 44, no. 2 (2020): 223–232.
Roy, A. “Urban Informality and the Politics of Planning: The Production of Space and Power.” Planning Theory 19, no. 3 (2020): 290–307.
Roy, A. “Urban Informality and the Postcolonial State: Housing and Planning in South Asia.” Planning Theory 19, no. 3 (2020): 243–265.
Sait, S. “Informal Settlements and the Regulatory State in South Asia: Between Legality and Legitimacy.” Third World Quarterly 43, no. 1 (2022): 112–130.
Sharma, B., et al. “Dynamic Policy Network of Urban Slum Settlement Collaboration: A Case Study of Pekanbaru, Riau Province, Indonesia.” IRSPPSD 11, no. 4 (2022).
Sharma, P. “Contested Urbanism and the Politics of Informality in Kathmandu.” Urban Studies 59, no. 12 (2022): 2421–2439.
Snijders, T. A. B., and R. J. Bosker. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. 2nd ed. Sage, 2012.
Springer, J., et al. “Assessing the Role of Participatory Planning Approach in Enhancing Informal Settlements Upgrading in Low-Income Regions.” Discover Global Society 2 (2024): 98.
Sundaresan, J. “Governing Informality: Planning Theory and Practice in Indian Cities.” Urban Studies 58, no. 14 (2021): 2892–2908.
Waliuzzaman, A. “Commoning the City for Survival in Urban Informal Settlements.” Asia Pacific Viewpoint 63, no. 2 (2022): 180–194.
Wekesa, B. W., G. S. Steyn, and M. Otieno. “Urban Upgrading in the Global South: Institutional Actors, Community Participation, and Sustainable Outcomes.” Habitat International 123 (2022): 102539.
World Bank. Fostering Financial Capability and Inclusion for MSMEs in Developing Economies. 2023.
Yiftachel, O. “Displaceability and Planning Theory.” Planning Theory 19, no. 1 (2020): 118–137.
Yiftachel, O. “Unrecognized Spaces, Informal Power: Urban Informality and Planning Theory.” Planning Theory 19, no. 1 (2020): 3–23.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kamaldeen Ibraheem Nageri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
