Islamic Civil Society and Constitutionalism Issues in Indonesia: Observing the Expressions of the Banyumas Muslim Community in Responding to the Dynamics of State Problems in Post-Reformation

Luqman Rico Khashogi; M. Wildan  Humaidi

doi:10.53639/ijssr.v4i3.193

Authors

Luqman Rico Khashogi Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia
M. Wildan Humaidi Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53639/ijssr.v4i3.193

Keywords:

Islamic civil society, big five, Banyumas

Abstract

This research seeks to map out the expressions of the Banyumas Muslim community in responding to the dynamics of state problems in post-reformation with the Big Five theory (Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neurotism). This research not only maps the potential involvement of Islamic civil society, but also contributes an important perspective as an effort to stabilize society and its various social groups. The method of collecting data was by distributing purposive questionnaires collecting 165 people. All of them consisted of various Islamic community organizations. The reliability used test-retest reliability, based on Friedman's theory with the lowest limitation of 0.90. The validity used direct validity, which is based on the development of the Big Five theory by Kathrin Ackermann, with moderate adjustments and concrete adaptations, thus it can be used operationally. The results of the study show that on the one hand, they have the character of extraversion (E) which has a more conservative attitude, encourages acceptance of hierarchy, and has more high trust in institutionalized matters. But on the other hand, they tend to be openness to experience (O) characters who have a critical attitude towards political, social values, norms and authority.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ackermann, Kathrin. “Personality and Politics in Context: The Interaction of Personality Traits and Contextual Factors in Shaping Political Behavior and Attitudes.” University of Bern, 2016.

Badan Pusat Statistik Banyumas. Kapubaten Banyumas Dalam Angka 2020. Banyumas, 2020.

Diamond, Larry. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. IRE Press, 2003.

Dinesen, Peter Thisted, Asbjørn Sonne Nørgaard, and Robert Klemmensen. “The Civic Personality: Personality and Democratic Citizenship.” Political Studies 62, no. S1 (2013): 1–19.

Hafiz, Muhammad, and Ismail Hasani. Kebebasan Beragama Dan Penguatan Stabilitas Politik-Keamanan Di Tahun Politik. Edited by Halili Hasan. I. Jakarta Selatan: Pustaka Masyarakat Setara, 2019. www.setara@setara-institute.org.

ICW. Laporan Akhir Tahun 2014. Jakarta, 2014. www.antikorupsi.org.

Jakarta, LBH. Catatan Akhir Tahun 2019: Reformasi Dikorupsi Demokrasi Direpresi. Jakarta, 2019.

Jati, Wasisto Raharjo. “Fenomena Kemunduran Demokrasi Indonesia 2021.” The Habibie Center THC Insights Juni, no. 27 (2021): 6. www.habibiecenter.or.id.

Jimly Asshiddiqie. Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.

Luthfi Makhasin. “Orientasi Ideologi Dan Pragmatisme Politik; Model Pembentukan Koalisi Dalam Pilkada Serentak Di Jawa Tengah 2015.” JSP Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik 19, no. 3 (2016): 238.

Masroer, and Lalu Darmawan. “Wacana Civil Society (Masyarakat Madani) Di Indoneisa.” Sosiologi Reflektif 10, no. 2 (2016): 35–63.

Mondak, Jeffery J., Matthew V. Hibbing, Damarys Canache, Mitchell A. Seligson, and Mary R. Anderson. “Personality and Civic Engagement: An Integrative Framework for the Study of Trait Effects on Political Behavior.” American Political Science Review 104, no. 1 (2010): 1–26.

Muhammad Asfar. “Wacana Masyarakat Madani (Civil Society): Relevansi Untuk Kasus Indonesia.” Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik XIV, no. 1 (2001): 49–60.

Muhammadiyah, Pimpinan Pusat. Keputusan Muktamar Muhammadiyah Ke-47. Yogyakarta, 2015.

Parmudi, Mochamad. “Kebangkitan Civil Society Di Indonesia.” Jurnal at-Taqaddun 7, no. 2 (2015): 295–310.

Pawestri, Ananda Galuh. “Membangun Identitas Budaya Banyumasan Melalui Dialek Ngapak Di Media Sosial.” Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra 19, no. 2 (2020): 255–266.

PBNU. Hasil-Hasil Muktamar Ke-33 Nahdlatul Ulama. Jakarta Pusat, 2016.

Purwanto. “Ekspresi Egaliter, Motif Batik Banyumas.” Jurnal Seni: Imajinasi IX, no. 1 (2015): 13–24. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/imajinasi/article/view/8851.

Syahrir Karim, and Samsu Adabi Mamat. “Islamisme Dan Demokratisasi Di Indoensia Pasca Reformasi:Analisis Sosio-Politik.” Sulesana 7, no. 2 (2012): 149–159.

Tim Peneliti Survei Ahli. Peta Sosial Politik Pemilu Serentak 2019. Edited by Esty Ekawati. 1st ed. Jakarta: LIPI Press, 2019.

Utami, Winda Wana, and Darmaiza Darmaiza. “Hate Speech, Agama, Dan Kontestasi Politik Di Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of Religion and Society 2, no. 2 (2020): 113–128.

Widyaningsih, Rindha. “Bahasa Ngapak Dan Mentalitas Orang Banyumas : Tinjauan Dari Perspektif Filsafat Bahasa Hans-Georg Gadamer.” Jurnal Ultiama Humaniora II, no. 2 (2014): 186–200.

———. “Bahasa Ngapak Dan Mentalitas Orang Banyumas.” Jurnal Ultima Humaniora II, no. 2 (2014): 186-200.

Wiktorowicz, Quintan. Islamic Activism: A Social Movement Theory Approach. I. USA: Indiana Univ. Press, 2004.