The Salaf Scholars’ Response towards differences of Legal Opinion in Islamic Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53639/ijssr.v4i2.173Keywords:
differences of legal opinion, Islamic law, mazhab, Salaf scholarsAbstract
A Prophetic hadith states that the best of people were in my time, and then the time after that, and then the time after that. Of course, it is a question for Muslims or non-Muslims, why the Prophet stated it. The above statement can certainly be seen from the ethics and academic reasoning of the post-Prophet generation. Maturity in arguing and accepting criticism is seen in the legal opinion of Ulama, especially in scientific ethics when there are differences of opinion with mutual respect and respect and usually concluded with a sentence if it is right then it is my mazhab and if it is wrong please leave it.
Downloads
References
al-Khātib, Hasan Aḥmad. al-Fiqh al-Muqāran. Cairo: Dār at-Ta'līf, 1957.
al-Raḥīm, Aḥmad ibn ‘Abd. Al-Insāf Fī Bayān Asbāb AlIkhtilāf. Beirut: Daar al-Kutub al-Ilmiah, 1990.
al-Samarqandī, Abī al-Fatḥ al-Asmandī. Tharīqah Al-Khilāf Bain Al-Aslāf. Beirut: Daar al-Kutub al-Ilmiah, 1990.
‘al-Zaibārī, Amir Sa‘īd. Baina Muttabi‘ wa Muqallid A‘mā fī Furū‘ al-Fiqh. Bairūt: Dār Ibn Hazm, 1995.
Amīn, Aḥmad. Duḥā Al-Islām. Edited by Maktabah an-Nahdah Al-Misriyyah. Cairo, 1990.
Auda, Jasser. Maqasid Al-Shari’ah as Philosophy of Islamic Law. International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), 2022.
Fadel, Mohammad. “Analogical Reasoning in Islamic Jurisprudence: A Study of the Juridicial Principle of Qlyas.” Journal of Law and Religion 15 (2001): 359–62.
Habib, Imran. “Ethics of Disagreement in Sharīʻah and Its Value for Contemporary Pakistani Society.” Pakistan Social Sciences Review 3, no. I (2019): 167–79. https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2019(3-i)12.
Hallaq, Wael B. “Was the Gate of Ijtihad Closed?” International Journal of Middle East Studies 16, no. 1 (1984): 3–41.
Nur, Iffatin, and Muhammad Ngizzul Muttaqin. “Reformulating The Concept of Maṣlaḥah: From A Textual Confinement Towards A Logic Determination.” Justicia Islamica: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial 17, no. 1 (2020): 73–91.
Qardhowi, Yusuf. “Gerakan Islam, Antara Perbedaan Yang Dibolehkan Dan Perpecahan Yang Dilarang.” Diterjemahkan oleh Rafiq, Aunur. Jakarta: Robbani Press, 1995.
Romli, S A, and S A Romli. “Muqaranah Mazahib Fil Ushul,” 2016.
Sadat, Anwar. “Ikhtilaf Di Kalangan Ulama Al-Mujtahidin.” Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum, 2015, 181–91.
Zahrah, Muḥammad Abū. Muḥādarah fī Tārikh Mazāhib al-Fiqhiyyah. Kairo: Matba‘ah al-Madānī, 1990.
Zuhdi, Muhammad. “Sikap Dan Etika Dalam Menghadapi Ikhtilaf Pendapat Mazhab Fiqih.” Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan 6, no. 2 (2019): 12–20.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Suraji Suraji
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
