Exploring Slavery Practices in 19th Century Bengal: Insights from Two Unpublished Human Sale Deeds at the Bangladesh National Museum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53639/ijssr.v6i1.308Keywords:
Self-Slavery, Human Sale Deeds, Bangladesh National Museum, East India Company, Colonial Economic PoliciesAbstract
This study explores the historical significance of two unpublished human sale deeds, dated 1214 and 1215 (1807-1808 AD), preserved in the Bangladesh National Museum. Collected in 1980 AD from Mymensingh District of Bangladesh, they provide significant insight into the practice of self-slavery in Bengal during the early 19th century under British colonial rule. Written in Bengali and Sanskrit using the 19th century Proto-Bengali script, these deeds reveal the dire socio-economic conditions that compelled individuals to sell themselves or their family members into servitude in exchange for basic necessities such as food, clothing, and minimal monetary price. Employing a qualitative research approach, this study integrates document analysis, translation, and historical contextualization to interpret the texts and explore their legal, socio-economic, and cultural implications. The findings indicate that the devastating consequences of the Famine of 1770, the exploitative revenue system formed by the Permanent Settlement of 1793, and deep-rooted inequalities within rural society contributed to an environment in 19th century Bengal where survival often necessitated the forfeiture of personal freedom. By situating these findings within the broader context of global discussions on slavery, the research challenges the dominant colonial narratives of progress and highlights the inequality and labor exploitation in contemporary society.
Downloads
References
Allen, Richard B. “Exporting the Unfortunate: The European Slave Trade From India, 1500–1800.” Slavery and Abolition 43, no. 3 (July 3, 2022): 533–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144039x.2021.2008719.
Batselé, Filip. “The Legal and Institutional Framework of Slavery.” In Studies in the History of Law and Justice, 13–62, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36855-5_2.
Bose, Sugata. Peasant Labour and Colonial Capital, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1017/chol9780521266949.
Chakraborty, Titas. “Slave Trading and Slave Resistance in the Indian Ocean World: The Case of Early Eighteenth-century Bengal.” Slavery and Abolition 40, no. 4 (May 2, 2019): 706–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144039x.2019.1606525.
Chatterjee, Indrani. Slavery and the Household in Bengal, 1770-1880. University of London (School of Oriental and African Stuidies), 1996. https://books.google.com.bd/books/about/Slavery_and_the_Household_in_Bengal_1770.html?id=t9uD0AEACAAJ&redir_esc=y.
Chatterjee, Indrani, and Richard M. Eaton. Slavery and South Asian History. University of Arizona, 2006. https://experts.arizona.edu/en/publications/slavery-and-south-asian-history.
Chattopadhyay, Amal Kumar. “Slavery in the Bengal Presidency Under East India Company Rule, 1772-1843,” 1963. https://doi.org/10.25501/soas.00033956.
Datta, Rajat. “Agricultural Production, Social Participation and Domination in Late Eighteenth‐century Bengal: Towards an Alternative Explanation.”The Journal of Peasant Studies 17, no. 1 (October 1, 1989): 68–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066158908438413.
Dhar, Hiranmay. “Agricultural Servitude in Bengal Presidency around 1800.” Economic and Political Weekly 8, no. 30 (1973). https://www.jstor.org/stable/4362899.
Ekama, Kate, Lisa Hellman, and Matthias Van Rossum. Slavery and bondage in Asia, 1550–1850. De Gruyter eBooks. De Gruyter, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110777246.
Finn, Margot. “SLAVES OUT OF CONTEXT: DOMESTIC SLAVERY AND THE ANGLO-INDIAN FAMILY,C. 1780–1830.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 19 (November 12, 2009): 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0080440109990090.
Gidwani, Vinay Krishin. “‘Waste’ and the Permanent Settlement in Bengal.” Economic and Political Weekly 27, no. 4 (1992). https://www.jstor.org/stable/4397526.
Irfan, Lubna. “Nature of Slavery and Servitude in Mughal India.” South Asian History and Culture 13, no. 4 (September 2, 2022): 466–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/19472498.2022.2120243.
Iyer, Vibha. “A Tangible Concept of Imperialism: Utsa Patnaik’s Estimates of Colonial Transfers From India.” The Indian Economic Journal 71, no. 1 (January 1, 2023): 229–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662221146647.
Jackson, Peter. “The Mamlūk Institution in Early Muslim India.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland. Cambridge University Press, April 1, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0035869x00108585.
Kalb, Emma. “Slavery in South Asia.” In Springer eBooks, 517–34, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13260-5_29.
Madhwi. “Collective Memory, Identity and the Legacies of Slavery and Indentured.” South Asian Diaspora 16, no. 2 (May 22, 2023): 282–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/19438192.2023.2215042.
Mallik, Senjuti. “The British East India Company and the Great Bengal Famine of 1770: Towards a Corporate Colonial Biopolitics.” Geographical Review 114, no. 4 (March 14, 2024): 464–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2024.2325977.
Mann, Michael. “A Permanent Settlement for the Ceded and Conquered Provinces: Revenue Administration in North India, 1801-1833.” The Indian Economic & Social History Review 32, no. 2 (June 1, 1995): 245–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/001946469503200205.
Mukerji, Karuna Moy. “Rents and Forms of Tenancy in Birbhum Since the Permanent Settlement.” The Indian Economic & Social History Review 14, no. 3 (July 1, 1977): 363–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/001946467701400304.
Mukherjee, Rila. “Mobility in the Bay of Bengal World.” Indian Historical Review 36, no. 1 (June 1, 2009): 109–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/037698360903600107.
Ray, Ratna. “Land Transfer and Social Change Under the Permanent Settlement: A Study of Two Localities.” The Indian Economic & Social History Review 11, no. 1 (January 1, 1974): 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/001946467401100101.
Singh, Virender. “Study of Economic Impact of British Colonial Rule.” ACADEMICIA an International Multidisciplinary Research Journal 11, no. 8 (January 1, 2021): 1–2. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7137.2021.01762.6.
Sohanuzzaman, Md. “Cirosthayi Bondobasto Prathar Provab O Protikria: Bibhutibhuson Bondopaddayer Aronyak ( Bangla).” Arts Faculty Journal 13, no. 18 (January 31, 2024): 215–26. https://doi.org/10.62296/kop20241318012.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Md. Sanaullah, Md. Abdul Muhit, Rudra Prosad Samaddar, Md Jowel Rana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).