Accountability Guidance and Counseling Program In the City of Banjarmasin Vocational School

Authors

  • Muhammad Yuliansyah Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari
  • I Nyoman Sujana Degeng Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Bambang Budi Wiyono Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Achmad Supriyanto Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Jarkawi Jarkawi Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari
  • Murdiansyah Herman Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2020/ijssr.v2i1.36

Keywords:

Accountability, Guidance and Counseling, Programs

Abstract

The existence of guidance and counseling is a basic need that must be prioritized in the life of the community Guidance and Counseling Services that are good and right, effective and efficient in developing guidance and counseling missions so that community recognition and trust will increase. Accountability is carried out periodically and in accordance with the provisions with effective documentation through measurement of results from professional activities. Accountability refers to accountability for the success or failure of achieving the results of an organization's program. The guidance and counseling profession as professional counselors masters and realizes their professional practice, the accountability of guidance and counseling must be carried out as an embodiment of the obligation to account for the success or failure of implementing the guidance and counseling program mission in achieving the stated goals and objectives.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Yuliansyah, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

 

 

 

I Nyoman Sujana Degeng, Universitas Negeri Malang

 

 

Bambang Budi Wiyono, Universitas Negeri Malang

 

 

Achmad Supriyanto, Universitas Negeri Malang

 

 

Jarkawi Jarkawi, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

 

 

Murdiansyah Herman, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

 

 

References

Richie, M. H., & Loesch, L. C. (2009). The Accountable School Counselor. Pennsylvania: CAPS Press.

Astramovich, R., & Coker, J. K. (2007). Program Evaluation in School Counseling : The Accountability Bridge. Journal of Counseling and Development :JCD, 162.

B. Mattew, A. M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analisys A Sources Book of New Method. Baverly Hill: Sage Publication.

Carino, L. V. (1991). Administrative Accountability: A Review of the EvolutioMeaning and Operationalization of a Key Concept in Public Administration. A. Friedberg, B. Geist, N. Mizrahi and I. Sharkansky (eds.), State Audit and Accountability.

Diltz, D. M. (2010). An Exploration of Accountability Practices of School Counselors: A National Study. Journal of Profesional counseling, Practice, Theory, and Research. Summer/Spring. Vol. 38, 52.

Dimmit, C. (2009). Why Evaluation Matters: Determining Effective School Counseling Practices. Profesional School Counseling. August. Vol. 12, 6.

Dollarhide, C. T., & Sadinak, K. A. (2008). Comprehensive School Counseling Programs: K-12 Delivery System. New York: Pearson.

Ghartey, J. (1987). Crisis, Accountability and Development in the Third World. London: Avebury.

Gibson, R. L., & Mitchell, M. H. (2011). Bimbingan dan Konseling. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Green, A., & Keys, S. (2001). Meeting the Need of 21st Century Student. Professional School Counseling.Alexandria:Dec. 2001. Vol. 5, Iss. 2.

Isaac, S. &. (1984). Hand Book In Reseacrh And Evaluation. California: Edits Publisher.

Jarkawi. (2018). Akuntabilitas Sistem Informasi Manajemen Kearsipan. Pekan Ilmiah Uniska (p. 5). Banjarmasin: Universitas Islam Kalimantan.

Jarkawi, Prasetia, J., & Mahfudz. (2018). Manajemen Strategi Mutu Layanan Bimbingan dan Konseling Berorientasi Public Trust Pada SMKN di Banjarmasin. OJS UNISKA.

Krumbolt, J. D. (1974). Krumboltz's social learning theory is where career development experts started to Craik and Price. Watlzawick.

Mardiasmo. (2009 ). Serial Otonomi Daerah: Otonomi & Manajemen Keuangan Daerah. Yogyakarta : ANDI.

Myrick, D. R. (2003). Accountability: Counselors count. Professional School Counseling,. 174-179.

Prayitno. (1997). Seri pemandu pleaksanaan bimbingan dan konseling di sekolah Buku III. Jakarta: Penebar Aksara.

Prayitno, D. A. (2004). Dasar dasar Bimbingan dan Konseling.

Prayitno, E. A., & Amti, E. (2004). Dasar-dasar bimbingan dan konseling. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

R. Bogdan and S. K. Biklen. (1982). Qualitatif research for education: and introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & bacon Inc.

Stone, C., & Dahir, C. (2007). An introduction to school counseling: Vision to action. Ohio: Merrill Prentice-Hall.

Sudrajat, S. d. (2001). Statistik Pendidikan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Suharto, E. (2006). Menengok kriteria keMiskinandiindonesia: Menimbang indikator kemiskinan berbasis Hak. JUrnal analisis sosial Vol. 14 no. 2 septemBer 2009, 31-39.

Yin. (2004). Case Study Research : design and methods. California Sage Publication.

Published

2021-03-05

How to Cite

Yuliansyah, Muhammad, I Nyoman Sujana Degeng, Bambang Budi Wiyono, Achmad Supriyanto, Jarkawi Jarkawi, and Murdiansyah Herman. 2021. “Accountability Guidance and Counseling Program In the City of Banjarmasin Vocational School”. International Journal of Social Science and Religion (IJSSR) 2 (1):93-104. https://doi.org/10.2020/ijssr.v2i1.36.

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)